Type Disputed Claim
Goods The only evidence the WSJ journal has provided is their claim that they have an insider "according to people familiar with Musk’s involvement." FEC or IRS data supporting this. This entity and it's affiliated entities were updated just a month ago and the FEC and Texas Ethics commission don't support the WSJ journals claims. The PACs with the same name at the FEC are not even the same entities America PAC did not exist at the time the flyers were created. https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?committee_id=C00404285&committee_id=C00532531 Garza has a history of attacking peopled opposed to him with baseless accusations of being "dark money, billionaires" Aside from Soros, it's often overlooked that Dustin Moskovitz has
Notes There's actually evidence to the contrary of the "no comment" from Garza being premeditated involved in the article from them sending out campaign emails immediately after the article was launched and propaganda like "responses" from the Garza campaign . https://www.kvue.com/article/news/local/elon-musk-funded-pac-jose-garza-responds-wall-street-journal-report/269-ef97cbe7-d912-47b6-9d9a-7b8c8eb51a5f https://littlesis.org/rails/active_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--c3f1bd96c9048b5777334f51f82990886db0c752/Screenshot%202024-09-12%20at%2010.34.37%20PM.png
Updated 4 months ago

Source Links