The Power Behind the UMD Study

September 11, 2017
Member of and FunderDirector of Public AffairsBoard member"Core Member" and Funder ($30,000/year)ChancellorBoard memberPresident and CEOImmediate Past ChairBoard memberdirector for regional developmentBusiness relationshipmanager of corporate communicationsBoard memberBoard memberMember of Dean’s Business Advisory Council of the Labovitz SchoolHierarchyMember and FunderDirectorDirectorsenior vice president of AlleteBoard memberCommissionedMedia contact person forPaid fee for studyProducedFormer board memberChancellor's Advisory Board for UMDBoard member of ALleteMember and funderLendley BlackMinnesota PowerAPEXEnbridgeLorraine LittleUMDNancy NorrBrian HansonRolf WebergAmy RutledgeSteve BurgessUMD Natural ResourcesResearch InstituteJobs forMinnesotansPat MullenEnbridge PipelineConstruction EconomicImpact StudyGeorge G. Goldfarb
 

APEX and the UMD Study

The University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD) study on Enbridge's Line 3 was commissioned by the Area Partnership for Economic Expansion, or APEX, a group that represents a coalition of business interests in northeastern Minnesota and the Duluth-Superior Twin Ports area. APEX CEO Brian Hanson is the media contact for the UMD study.

APEX requested the study from UMD in cooperation with Enbridge, the fossil fuel corporation that is proposing and who will build and use the Line 3 replacement pipeline. Enbridge is is a dues-paying member of APEX. Enbridge, who has a vested interest in the study's results, provided inputs for the UMD study.

APEX paid UMD $3,000 for the study. The study does not explicitly disclose that it was produced for a fee, or for how much. According to UMD, the current study is an update of a 2015 study that an Enbridge-hired consulting firm commissioned from UMD for $12,692.